Susan Sarandon and Jessica Lange |
"I can't go into rehab -- I've got the Dean Martin roast!" -- Bette Davis.
Movie legend Joan Crawford (Jessica Lange of American Horror Story: Asylum) goes to see another movie legend, Bette Davis (Susan Sarandon of The Other Side of Midnight), and offers her the title role in a film version of the novel "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?" During filming with director Robert Aldrich (Alfred Molina of Prick Up Your Ears), long-simmering resentments and rivalries resurface, and while the two women resolve to have a united front against the twin demons of ageism and sexism, jealousies and insecurities only drive them farther apart. It all culminates when Davis gets an Oscar nod and Crawford doesn't ...
The real Bette Davis and Joan Crawford |
Now, as to the mini-series itself, once you get past the fabrications and dramatic licenses taken, it manages to go beyond its initial premise and explore the struggles of aging women played out against an industry where an old woman is simply considered a 'hag." The feminist angle is explored but never overwhelms the production, nor does it necessarily excuse the ladies' bad behavior, which could often be chalked up to extreme sensitivity on any number of issues. Of the two lead actresses, Lange comes off the best -- the real Crawford was much better-looking than Lange in her nearly grotesque make up, and had much more authority -- but otherwise Lange proves herself a fine actress and gives a commendable performance. Of the two icons, Davis was imitated much more than Crawford, so Sarandon had a dilemma: how to play a real person without coming off like a drag impersonator. Sarandon succeeds in making Davis seem real, but her performance is also a little dull -- for lack of a better word -- in comparison to Lange's. However, both women are good, although neither of them have the kind of intense power, personality or sheer charisma of the real Crawford and Davis. And when they recreate scenes from Baby Jane? neither are as good as the original stars.
Feud benefits from some superb supporting performances: Alfred Molina as Robert Aldrich; Stanley Tucci as Jack Warner; Alison Wright as Aldrich's assistant Pauline Jameson; Molly Price as Aldrich's wife, Harriet; John Rubinstein as George Cukor; and especially Jackie Hoffman as Crawford's maid and companion, "Mamacita," and a scene-stealing Judy Davis [Life with Judy Garland: Me and My Shadows] as Hedda Hopper. On the other hand, Catherine Zeta-Jones doesn't remind me of Olivia de Havilland at all (although you would think de Havilland would have been flattered that she was played by a much younger and beautiful actress.) And Kathy Bates makes a rather mediocre Joan Blondell. The sections showing them being interviewed about the feud could easily have been jettisoned.
Dominic Burgess seems to think that because his character, actor Victor Buono, was gay that he should play him more as a stereotype than he was in real life. While Buono is a colorful character, it's strange that Feud completely omits Maidie Norman, the black actress who played the murdered maid Elvira in Baby Jane? and who had a very interesting life -- was it because she was a lifelong Republican? Feud is perhaps more sympathetic to Joan than it is to Bette, and suggests that her daughter Christina's hateful memoirs were not entirely accurate, if at all.
It's interesting that the writers for this series must have done research by poring over bios of the two screen idols -- books such as Fasten Your Seat Belts: The Passionate Life of Bette Davis and Joan Crawford: The Essential Biography -- but none are given credit, and that even includes an exaggerated tome entitled Bette and Joan: The Divine Feud!
Verdict: Fascinating, amusing, dramatic, even poignant look at old Hollywood and how stars desperately cling to every inch they've gained while at times losing their humanity in the struggle. ***1/2.
I enjoyed this too, Bill, very much, though as something of a scholar on the subject matter (as you are) I did quibble with some of the conflation of facts and artistic license. Agree, Sarandon and Lange are strong but no one could really portray these charismatic supernovas--though Dunaway comes close despite the absurdities of Mommie Dearest. I totally agree about Zeta Jones (whom I like) and Bates (who is usually amazing), they were underwhelming. I wish there had been more of Judy Davis's Hedda or even a cameo of Davis's fabulous Garland!
ReplyDeleteGreat show I need to watch again!
-Chris
Yes. a Garland cameo would have been fun, as I believe she was still alive at that point. Judy Davis was so entertaining as Hedda Hopper that she nearly stole all of the scenes with the stars. To be fair to Dunaway she did have intensity, something which Lange -- as good as she was -- lacked iner her Crawford portrayal. Still I think we agree that while no actress could ever really approximate these two giants, Lange and Sarandon do a pretty good job, considering what -- or rather who -- they were up against.
ReplyDeleteLange was amazing to me. She brought new life, new nuances to Joan. To me, this was a near impossible task given that to this day, there is still a significant wake cascading from Dunaway’s battleship of a performance. How does one play a Hollywood personality who’s image was steamrolled and virtually replaced by someone else’s earlier portrayal of that Hollywood personality? For me, Jessica Lange was able to fully erase Mommie Dearest from your mind for the time you were watching.
ReplyDeleteYes, on that I have to agree with you. Lange has supplanted Dunaway as Crawford and, as you say, that is no easy task.
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading, and thanks for your comments!