|
Peter Lorre pleads his case |
M (1931), Director: Fritz Lang.
In Germany a series of young girls have been abducted and presumably murdered. The police. headed by Inspector Lohmann (Otto Wernicke), are using all of their resources to track down this fiend, but can't zero in on him. Members of the underworld, represented by Schranker (Gustaf Grundgens), himself a murderer, gather together to try to deal with the fact that the search for the child-killer is drastically and negatively interfering with their own operations. The crooks determine to find the maniac themselves, and employ the beggars of the city to help them do so. A blind balloon seller who recalls a man whistling when one child goes missing is able to direct the thieves and cutthroats to one Hans Beckert (Peter Lorre), and he is put on trial by the city's underworld.
|
Determined to catch the killer: Otto Wernicke |
Frankly,
M, long considered a classic and a masterpiece (I never held with the latter opinion), does not hold up well. The movie is rather slow, often primitive -- with long stretches of silence (sometimes strikingly interrupted by noise) -- although there are certainly touches of mild cinematic virtuosity. The final section of the film, the underground trial, presents Beckert as mentally ill and unable to control himself, an attitude that would not be that well-received today. (Some people would rather shoot themselves than hurt a child, and why couldn't Beckert have sought help when he realized he had these impulses?) The sequence can also be taken as a plea against capital punishment, with three mothers at the very end saying "it won't bring our children back." Having the killer judged by criminals also enables the film to supposedly take a moral high road it doesn't deserve. At times
M has a light touch that is at odds with the proceedings.
Peter Lorre gives a very good performance, however. Lohmann apparently played the same role two years later in Lang's
Testament of Dr. Mabuse. The prolific Fritz Lang directed everything from genuine masterpieces like
Clash By Night and
Scarlet Street to stinkers like
Secret Beyond the Door ... There was an American remake of
M twenty years later.
Verdict: I don't care what some so-called film scholars say -- this is a bit dull all told. **,
Agreed. It's very atmospheric; great cinematography, but I also find it slow and plodding. I prefer Lorre in The Maltese Falcon! Now that film really moves! LOL.
ReplyDelete-C
In truth I think most people would rather watch the much more entertaining "Maltese Falcon" than be bored by "M."
ReplyDelete