|
When will he remember? Greer Garson and Ronald Colman |
RANDOM HARVEST (1942). Director: Mervyn LeRoy.
Towards the end of WWI, an amnesiac and shell-shocked soldier named "John Smith" (Ronald Colman) is institutionalized in a small British town, but he escapes during the melee when the end of the war is announced. He meets up with a sympathetic music hall entertainer named Paula (Greer Garson), and the two eventually fall in love, get married, and have a child. But when "Smithy" goes to Liverpool for a job interview, he is struck by a taxi and his memory comes back -- he is really a wealthy man named Charles Rainier. Unfortunately, he goes back to his old life with absolutely no recollection of his wife and baby. Will Paula ever be reunited with the man she loves?
|
Greer Garson |
Random Harvest is based on a novel by James Hilton, and in some ways its story is just as absurd as anything in
Lost Horizon. (It's not surprising the movie was spoofed on
The Carol Burnett Show. For one thing, the notion that a blow to the head can both cause and cure amnesia is utterly ludicrous.) I haven't read the novel, so I'm not going to blame Hilton for any deficiencies in the screenplay, which he didn't write, but the structure of the film had to be changed from the book. In the novel the true identity of the woman Rainier marries when his memory is restored comes as a surprise. But before I get to that, I'll examine the film itself and what it offers the viewer.
|
Susan Peters and Ronald Colman |
Random Harvest is essentially a well-produced (MGM) soap opera with fine photography by Joseph Rutternberg, an effective score by Herbert Stothart, and an excellent cast. Garson is splendid throughout, and Colman, although basically too old for the part, is also first-class. They are matched by Susan Peters [
The Sign of the Ram] as Kitty, a young woman who falls for Charles and nearly gets him to the altar. Peters is especially great in a sequence when she looks at Charles, realizes his mind is elsewhere, and that marrying him would be a mistake for both of them. Una O'Connor, Arthur Shields, Arthur Space. Elisabeth Risdon, Reginald Owen, Alan Napier, and Philip Dorn, among others, enrich the supporting cast.
|
Ronald Colman |
SPOILER ALERT: Stop reading if you haven't seen the picture.
Random House must be taken with a grain of salt. It works beautifully on an emotional level, and has a moving conclusion, but the fact is that it is so contrived as to be nearly comical. After "Smithy" disappears, Paula tracks him down and begins to work for him under an assumed name. Years go by. Not only does he not recognize her, but he never develops any particular feelings for her. He eventually marries Paula, more as a "merger," as he puts it, than a romantic gesture, because he needs a "good wife."
Three years go by during which Paula becomes the perfect hostess and loving wife, yet Charles still doesn't recognize her and still never develops any special feelings for her. Now this begs the question: since Paula is the same person she always was and has the same qualities that drew Charles to her in the first place, why on earth
doesn't he fall in love with her all over again? One can argue that it was circumstances that made the difference, but come on! It isn't until he
finally remembers her that he realizes he's in love with her. Or does he? (Thank goodness they avoided the cliche of him being hit on the head
again.)
Verdict: Well, if you can just suspend disbelief
Random Harvest has its rewards. For romantic souls only! ***.
Greer Garson always impresses me me in all her pictures, including this one and of course Mrs.Miniver. She inherited all the juicy roles that MGM usually gave to Garbo and Shearer who retired, and Crawford who was let go from the studio and reinvented herself at Warner’s.
ReplyDelete- Chris
Garson was a fine actress, a rare beauty, and had real class. Reminds me that soon I'll have to take another look at the picture she did with Crawford, "When Ladies Meet." Good picture!
ReplyDeleteLove Random Harvest. Is truly a cinematic gem with a profound message. Loved it.
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed the film, despite its sometimes strange plot turns it has many rewards.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment!
The plot is as improbable as they come, and the leads are too old, at least in the "Smithy" phase of the film. Even on the umpteenth viewing, I still want to yell at the screen, "why don't you just TELL him?" None of that matters to me because I was instantly caught up by Garson's tender compassion and Colman's child like dependence. It's romance on a grand, heart wrenching scale, the kind we dream of but thankfully never really have to endure. Random Harvest is definitely on my desert island list because I love Colman and Garson, but mostly because it never fails to make me ugly cry.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your very interesting comments on "Random Harvest." You've summed up the appeal of the picture very well; one gets past the improbable aspects because, as I say, it works beautifully on an emotional level. I'm sure that a lot of people watching the movie want to scream at Garson the same way you did! The excellent performances carry one along through all of the plot twists. Both actors are at the top of their form in this.
ReplyDelete